Glagow University Student Television have produced a promo video. That’s promo not porno, but someone obviously misread the brief. Much consternation has been caused on their facebook page among female students over the contents and style of the video. The response from GUST has been almost as stunning as the video itself.
Your comments about it being sexist are unprecedented, if you don’t think the girls in it are sexy, then you don’t appreciate beauty
And then this from another contributor
…just why exactly is the Gust video sexist? Every critic of the video has declared it to be sexist without ever giving reasons why.
So…lets look at the video – take a wee peek here
The scene starts with a manicured fingernail pushing a button followed by a close up shot of a female mouth in close proximity to a very phallic mike. It’s then followed up with the camera following an attractive female as she walks down a corridor, then beckons the viewer through a door where a roomful of attractive young women dressed and made up more for a night of clubbing than a filming session await.
The next scene is then the camera traveling around the room, lingering on the bare back of a computer user, across a young woman stroking her her headset, lingers on another woman who smiles at the camera…and then there is a cut scene of a female shadow behind a curtain. A pout, a wink, an eyeflicker then a woman holding another phallic symbol before another cut scene of a female form behind a curtain. A hairflick and then (hurrah!) at last at, halfway into the video we see the first (and only) non-objectified woman behind a camera – shame they had to spoil it by overlaying yet another female/curtain shot. A liplick in front of a mike more phallic than the first, a knowing look, high heels, a shy smile and finally a hipwiggle. This whole scene, from when we the viewer enter through the door until fade lasts 30 seconds with 16 instances of objectification. A woman is being objectified literally every two seconds.
The final scene is of the camera panning across a vista of static women positioned on a set of stairs. They are illuminated briefly, then fall into darkness as the shadow of a camera pointing at the static women is the last thing we see.
This video was designed to encourage people to become involved with Glasgow University Student Television and was written, performed, filmed and directed by them. GUST isnt entirely female – so why are there only females in the film? …and if all the females were on camera – who did the filming? The whole middle scene is filled with come-hither looks, signals of sexual desire and phallic imagery. It is aimed at attracting the viewer, and the manner in which they have chosen to attract the viewer is through female sexuality. So ultimately we have a promo designed to attract new recruits to a student society, where the female members of the society perform in a sexual manner.
There is precisely one instance where a woman is seen with technical equipment using it as it should be used, in all other instances it is either being used as a prop, or the manner of filming is deliberately sexualised. That is interspersed with random shots of women behind curtains and sexualised imagery completely unrelated to purpose.
In their defence it is pretty well shot, and the final scene of doll-like women briefly illuminated then falling into darkness as a shadowy camera is trained on them approaches Arthouse. If this were a student project to develop a short illustrating how gender issues are represented in film, it would get an A rating as a case study in female objectification and the male gaze.